ג׳ בטבת ה׳תש״פ (December 31, 2019)

On a New Damascus Fragment and/or Scroll?

ג׳ בטבת ה׳תש״פ (December 31, 2019) James M. Tucker Leave a comment

At the outset of my work on the Damascus Document, I realised that all images of the fragments would need…

Posted in: Dead Sea Scrolls, Digital Humanities, Judean Desert Scrolls, PAM Images Filed under: Damascus Covenant, Fastai, Serekh ha Yahad, Unidentified Fragments, University of Toronto

Regions of Interest Quantified – Solving Problems of the Analogue Methods of the Discoveries in the Judean Desert Series (Part III.2)

כ״א בכסלו ה׳תש״פ (December 19, 2019) James M. Tucker Leave a comment

Our last post ended by introducing the idea of Regions of Interest (ROI). Regions of Interest is not a new…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Dead Sea Scrolls, Digital Humanities, Judean Desert Scrolls Filed under: 4Q230, Computer Vision, Editorial Best Practices, OpenCV, Philology, Python, Tigchelaar

Update and Reflection on Ezra’s Legacy and the Dead Sea Scrolls, Birmingham, UK

י״ט בכסלו ה׳תש״פ (December 17, 2019) James M. Tucker Leave a comment

We find in Ezra 1:1 the following statement: “In the first year of King Cyrus of Persia, when the word…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Dead Sea Scrolls, Judean Desert Scrolls Filed under: Birmingham UK, Charlotte Hempel, Ezra-Nehemiah, Serekh ha Yahad, The Rule of the Community

A Thought on Editions: The Role of an Edition

י״ח בכסלו ה׳תש״פ (December 16, 2019) James M. Tucker Leave a comment

I recently wrote a book of review of Morales, Pablo Torijano, and Andrés Piquer Otero, eds. The Text of the…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Dead Sea Scrolls, Hebrew Bible, Textual Criticism Filed under: Bibliography, Digital Editions, Editorial Theory, Hebrew University Bible Project, Material Philology, Michael Segal

Regions of Interest Quantified – Solving Problems of the Analogue Methods of the Discoveries in the Judean Desert Series (Part III.1)

י״ג בכסלו ה׳תש״פ (December 11, 2019) James M. Tucker 2 Comments

In this post, I continue with an examination of reconstructing the very fragmentary Judean Desert Scrolls (sometimes called, Dead Sea Scrolls). I focus on 1QSa II lines 11–12.

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Dead Sea Scrolls, Judean Desert Scrolls Filed under: 1QSa, Computer Vision, Frank Moore Cross, Licht, Messianism, Palaeography, Philology, Stuckenbruck

Search for:

Bibliography

2455225 items 1 default desc https://jamesmtucker.com/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/

Lakoff, George. 2012. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Paperback ed., [Nachdr.]. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.

Schironi, Francesca. 2012. “Greek Commentaries.” Dead Sea Discoveries : A Journal of Current Research on the Scrolls and Related Literature 19 (3): 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685179-12341238.

Jacobs, Jarod T. 2015. “The Balance of Probability: A Statistically Based Analysis of the Linguistic Character of the ‘Biblical’ Dead Sea Scrolls.” ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1784057251?pq-origsite=primo.

O’Neill, Helen, Anne Welsh, David A Smith, Glenn Roe, and Melissa Terras. 2021. “Text Mining Mill: Computationally Detecting Influence in the Writings of John Stuart Mill from Library Records.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, no. fqab010 (February). https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab010.

Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading. New York: Verso Books.

Cross, Frank Moore. 1993. “VI. On the History of the Photography.” In Companion Volume to the Dead Sea Scrolls Microfiche Edition, edited by Emanuel Tov, 2nd ed., 121–22. Brill: Leiden.

Tov, Emanuel, Kipp Davis, and Robert Duke, eds. 2016. Dead Sea Scrolls Fragments in the Museum Collection. Leiden: Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/33413.

Greshko, Michael. 2020. “Exclusive: ‘Dead Sea Scrolls’ at the Museum of the Bible Are All Forgeries.” National Geographic, March 13, 2020. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/museum-of-the-bible-dead-sea-scrolls-forgeries.

Lachmann, Karl. 1871. de rerum natura: libri sex. Berolini: Impensis G. Reimeri. http://archive.org/details/dererumnatu00lucr.

“Textual Criticism Transformed – From Stemma of Variants to a Network of Variances – James M. Tucker.” n.d. Accessed February 26, 2021. https://jamesmtucker.com/?p=1003&preview=true.

Kalavainen, Hannu, and Tuukka Kauhanen. 2019. “Automated Semantic Tagging of the Göttingen Septuagint Apparatus.” In . San Diego. https://www.academia.edu/41049931/AUTOMATED_SEMANTIC_TAGGING_OF_THE_G%C3%96TTINGEN_SEPTUAGINT_APPARATUS.

Furstenberg, Yair. 2015. “The Midrash of Jesus and The Bavli’s Counter-Gospel.” Jewish Studies Quarterly 22 (4): 303–24.

טיכלאר, אייברט. תשפ״א. “4QDⁱ–4Q273a: קטע חדש של ברית דמשק ז 7-13 ממערה 4.” מגילות טו.

קיסטר, מנחם, and Menahem Kister. 2018. “בין מגילות כיתתיות לספרות חז"ל - Sectarian Scrolls and Rabbinic Literature: ניגוד, דמיון והקבלה.” Meghillot: Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls / מגילות: מחקרים במגילות מדבר יהודה יד: 139–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26912064.

Naudé, Jacobus A., and Cynthia Miller-Naudé. 2020. “Linguistics and Philology—Separate, Overlapping or Subordinate/Superordinate Disciplines? Linguistic and Philological Perspectives: Papers Forming Part of the 2017 and 2018 SBL Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew Seminar.” Journal for Semitics 29 (2): 28 pages-28 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/8573.

Peters, Janelle. 2021. “Judith and the Elders of 1 Clement.” Open Theology 7 (1): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0145.

Siraganian, Lisa. 2021. “The Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities.” Law & Literature 0 (0): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.2021.1872949.

O’Sullivan, James. 2021. Electronic Literature as Digital Humanities: Contexts, Forms, & Practices. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501363474.

Burrows, Simon, and Glenn Roe. 2020. Digitizing Enlightenment: Digital Humanities and the Transformation of Eighteenth-Century Studies. https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws%3A58832/.

Reggiani, Nicola. 2017. Digital Papyrology i. De Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110547474/html.

Aejmelaeus, Anneli. 1982. Parataxis in the Septuagint: A Study of the Renderings of the Hebrew Coordinate Clauses in the Greek Pentateuch. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.

Ancient Worlds in Digital Culture. 2016. Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/33504.

Clivaz, Claire. 2019. Ecritures Digitales: Digital Writing, Digital Scriptures. Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/54748.

Ancient Manuscripts in Digital Culture: Visualisation, Data Mining, Communication. 2019. Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/34930.

Cyberresearch on the Ancient near East and Neighboring Regions: Case Studies on Archaeological Data, Objects, Texts, and Digital Archiving. 2018. Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/34932.

digitalhistory. n.d. “James Baillie/Tara Andrews/Maxim Romanov/Daniel Knox/Maria Vargha: Modelling Historical Information with Structured Assertion Records.” Billet. Digital History Berlin (blog). Accessed February 24, 2021. https://dhistory.hypotheses.org/518.

Drucker, Johanna. 2011. “Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 005 (1).

Pasin, Michele, and John Bradley. 2015. “Factoid-Based Prosopography and Computer Ontologies: Towards an Integrated Approach.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 30 (1): 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt037.

Boyd, Samuel L. 2021. Language Contact, Colonial Administration, and the Construction of Identity in Ancient Israel: Constructing the Context for Contact. Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/39263.

Jellicoe, Sidney. 1993. The Septuagint and Modern Study. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.

Brooke, A. E. 1920. “Review of A Handbook to the Septuagint.” The Journal of Theological Studies 22 (85): 74–76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23950438.

Dines, Jennifer M. 2004. The Septuagint. New York: T&T Clark.

Ratzon, Eshbal, and Nachum Dershowitz. 2020. “The Length of a Scroll: Quantitative Evaluation of Material Reconstructions.” PLOS ONE 15 (10): e0239831. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239831.

Bacchi, Ashley. 2020. Uncovering Jewish Creativity in Book III of the Sibylline Oracles: Gender, Intertextuality, and Politics. Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/56992.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lima, Manuel author. 2014. The Book of Trees: Visualizing Branches of Knowledge / Manuel Lima. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Yardney, Sarah Shaw. 2017. “Interpretation in the Septuagint of Samuel.” Ph.D., United States -- Illinois: The University of Chicago. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1928953318/abstract/5CF1CB53335D4DCCPQ/1.

De Troyer, Kristin. 2014. In the Footsteps of Sherlock Holmes: Studies in the Biblical Text in Honour of Anneli Aejmelaeus. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology 72. Leuven: Peeters.

Müller, R., and J. Pakkala. 2017. Insights Into Editing in the Hebrew Bible and the Ancient Near East: What Does Documented Evidence Tell Us about the Transmission of Authoritative Texts? Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology. Louvain: Peeters. https://books.google.de/books?id=EopfAQAACAAJ.

Brooke, George J. 2017. “What Is Editing? What Is an Edition? Towards a Taxonomy for Late Second Temple Jewish Literature.” In Insights into Editing in the Hebrew Bible and the Ancient Near East What Does Documented Evidence Tell Us about the Transmission of Authoritative Texts?, edited by Reinhard Müller and Juha Pakkala, 23–40. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis & Theology 84. Leuven: Peeters.

Brooke, George. 2014. “What Is a Variant Edition? Perspectives from the Qumran Scrolls.” In In the Footsteps of Sherlock Holmes: Studies in the Biblical Text in Honour of Anneli Aejmelaeus, edited by Kristin De Troyer, T. Michael Law, and Marketta Liljeström, 607–22. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis & Theology 72. Leuven: Peeters.

Gehl, Robert W. 2018. “Archives for the Dark Web: A Field Guide for Study.” In Research Methods for the Digital Humanities, edited by lewis levenberg, Tai Neilson, and David Rheams, 31–51. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96713-4_3.

Grincheva, Natalia. 2018. “Researching Online Museums: Digital Methods to Study Virtual Visitors.” In Research Methods for the Digital Humanities, edited by lewis levenberg, Tai Neilson, and David Rheams, 103–28. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96713-4_7.

Wood, Zebulun M., Albert William, Ayoung Yoon, and Andrea Copeland. 2018. “Virtual Bethel: Preservation of Indianapolis’s Oldest Black Church.” In Research Methods for the Digital Humanities, edited by lewis levenberg, Tai Neilson, and David Rheams, 195–210. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96713-4_11.

Risam, Roopika. 2018. “Telling Untold Stories: Digital Textual Recovery Methods.” In Research Methods for the Digital Humanities, edited by lewis levenberg, Tai Neilson, and David Rheams, 309–18. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96713-4_17.

Rheams, David. 2018. “Creating an Influencer-Relationship Model to Locate Actors in Environmental Communications.” In Research Methods for the Digital Humanities, edited by lewis levenberg, Tai Neilson, and David Rheams, 63–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96713-4_5.

Roued-Cunliffe, Henriette. 2018. “Developing Sustainable Open Heritage Datasets.” In Research Methods for the Digital Humanities, edited by lewis levenberg, Tai Neilson, and David Rheams, 287–307. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96713-4_16.

Wills, Tarrin. 2018. “User Interfaces for Creating Digital Research.” In Research Methods for the Digital Humanities, edited by lewis levenberg, Tai Neilson, and David Rheams, 263–86. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96713-4_15.

Neilson, Tai. 2018. “Digital Media, Conventional Methods: Using Video Interviews to Study the Labor of Digital Journalism.” In Research Methods for the Digital Humanities, edited by lewis levenberg, Tai Neilson, and David Rheams, 151–71. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96713-4_9.

Bressan, Federica. 2018. “A Philological Approach to Sound Preservation.” In Research Methods for the Digital Humanities, edited by lewis levenberg, Tai Neilson, and David Rheams, 243–61. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96713-4_14.